PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsNot Another Other: Bridging Data Collection with SDTM Mapping Without Open Text Fields DS10 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsEnabling Innovation: Lessons from the CDISC AI Innovation Challenge DS11 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsStandardising Exposure-Response Data for Modelling and Simulation Using CDISC Principles and {admiral} DS12 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsMultiple Sclerosis Trials Unpacked: Standards, Endpoints and Programming Experience DS14 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsSDTM Automation: Implementation, Rollout and Lessons Learnt DS16 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsCDISC Biomedical Concepts for Breast Cancer: A CDISC 360i Perspective DS17 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsMetadata-Driven TFL Generation: End-to-End Automation from Protocol to Output DS18 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsFrom System Exports to Standards: Will Standardisation of External Vendor Data Redefine Clinical Data Management/Analysis? DS19 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsTransforming Legacy Data into CDISC Standards: Practical Approaches and Regulatory Insights DS20 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsOptimising Trial Design Dataset Creation To Minimise P21 Compliance Issues DS22 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsFrom Data to Dossier: Lessons from Cross-Company Regulatory Submissions SA01 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsBreaking Free from the xpt: Exploration of Dataset-JSON as an Alternative Transport File to Regulatory Agencies SA02 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsAcquiring a Compound with Multiple Clinical Trials? Let’s Get Ready for a Type C Meeting! Key Considerations for Preparing Its Regulatory Submission SA03 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsTrends in eSub Evaluation Findings: A Twenty-Year Perspective on Data Traceability SA04 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsElectronic Submission of Population PK Analysis Files… What’s Your Modus Operandi? SA05 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsCommon Issues in BIMO Clinical Site Dataset Packages SA07 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsKey Guidelines, Tricks and Experiences for the PMDA and a Comparison with FDA and NMPA CDE Submissions SA08 US · AustinSee metadata
PHUSE2026·Connect·Industry StandardsMulti-Standard Submission – Process, Learnings and Recommendations for Best Practice SA09 US · AustinSee metadata